From e93da8b04da86773247aadb1cbb1912e4f4526b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Priyansh Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:49:59 +0530 Subject: Rewriting Project --- .../jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 node_modules/jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js (limited to 'node_modules/jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js') diff --git a/node_modules/jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js b/node_modules/jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0ab610e --- /dev/null +++ b/node_modules/jquery/src/css/var/isHiddenWithinTree.js @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +define( [ + "../../core", + "../../core/isAttached" + + // css is assumed +], function( jQuery, isAttached ) { + "use strict"; + + // isHiddenWithinTree reports if an element has a non-"none" display style (inline and/or + // through the CSS cascade), which is useful in deciding whether or not to make it visible. + // It differs from the :hidden selector (jQuery.expr.pseudos.hidden) in two important ways: + // * A hidden ancestor does not force an element to be classified as hidden. + // * Being disconnected from the document does not force an element to be classified as hidden. + // These differences improve the behavior of .toggle() et al. when applied to elements that are + // detached or contained within hidden ancestors (gh-2404, gh-2863). + return function( elem, el ) { + + // isHiddenWithinTree might be called from jQuery#filter function; + // in that case, element will be second argument + elem = el || elem; + + // Inline style trumps all + return elem.style.display === "none" || + elem.style.display === "" && + + // Otherwise, check computed style + // Support: Firefox <=43 - 45 + // Disconnected elements can have computed display: none, so first confirm that elem is + // in the document. + isAttached( elem ) && + + jQuery.css( elem, "display" ) === "none"; + }; +} ); -- cgit v1.2.3