diff options
| author | patrickhlauke <[email protected]> | 2017-12-25 23:15:21 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mark Otto <[email protected]> | 2017-12-27 16:28:10 -0800 |
| commit | e3f9c463fc862da4d04a1615c0e5aab3df7b2625 (patch) | |
| tree | 8aa0e3ef50b7841fa8654d13ba37b34f5b7fc4c7 /dist | |
| parent | 8ae78b6820de1489392d21a8c10a65fd93a59533 (diff) | |
| download | bootstrap-e3f9c463fc862da4d04a1615c0e5aab3df7b2625.tar.xz bootstrap-e3f9c463fc862da4d04a1615c0e5aab3df7b2625.zip | |
Opinionated: reintroduce `cursor:pointer`
Explicitly re-adds the "hand" `cursor:pointer` for non-disabled `.btn`, `.close`, `.navbar-toggler` elements, as well as forcing `page-link` pagination controls to always have the "hand" cursor (even if an author uses it on, say, `<button>` elements for a dynamically updating in-page pagination).
Controversial, as everybody jumped on the bandwagon following this article https://medium.com/simple-human/buttons-shouldnt-have-a-hand-cursor-b11e99ca374b - which does have its merits of course, but there are also counter-arguments like http://kizu.ru/en/issues/cursor-pointer/
And seeing the amount of issues we've seen following the change, and the potential complexity needed to consistently address the cursor issue (see https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/24156 where i explore how the cursor needs to be based on "intent", and how that's tough to determine), I'm favouring an opinionated take here of just reintroducing the `cursor:pointer`.
Diffstat (limited to 'dist')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions