chore(coverage): exclude_also + global --cov=edify addopts + anti-vacuous and pragma discipline tests

2 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/discipline/coverage.test.py b/tests/discipline/coverage.test.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a534424
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/discipline/coverage.test.py
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+"""Anti-vacuous-green coverage discipline.
+
+If ``[tool.coverage.run].source`` ever points at the wrong directory (say,
+``src/edify`` post-reorg while the code moved back to ``edify/``), the
+``--cov-fail-under`` gate passes with an empty file list — a 100% score
+over zero measured lines. This test rebuilds the source-file discovery
+that coverage.py runs internally, asserts the file list is non-empty, and
+asserts every listed file is a real Python source inside ``edify/``.
+"""
+
+from pathlib import Path
+
+import coverage
+
+_REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).parent.parent.parent
+_EDIFY_ROOT = _REPO_ROOT / "edify"
+
+
+def test_coverage_run_source_resolves_to_the_edify_package_tree():
+    coverage_instance = coverage.Coverage()
+    configured_sources = coverage_instance.config.source
+    assert configured_sources is not None
+    assert configured_sources != [], (
+        "coverage's [tool.coverage.run].source is empty — the gate would pass over "
+        "zero measured lines. Point source at 'edify'."
+    )
+    for entry in configured_sources:
+        assert entry == "edify", (
+            f"coverage source contains {entry!r} — expected exactly ['edify']. "
+            "A wrong source path is the one way this gate passes vacuously green."
+        )
+
+
+def test_edify_package_tree_contains_measurable_python_source():
+    python_files = sorted(_EDIFY_ROOT.rglob("*.py"))
+    assert python_files, (
+        "no Python files found under edify/ — the coverage source directory is empty."
+    )
+    total_source_bytes = sum(python_file.stat().st_size for python_file in python_files)
+    assert total_source_bytes > 0, (
+        "every file under edify/ is empty — coverage would measure nothing across the tree."
+    )
+    non_init_source_files = [path for path in python_files if path.name != "__init__.py"]
+    assert non_init_source_files, (
+        "edify/ contains only __init__.py files — nothing substantial for coverage to measure."
+    )
diff --git a/tests/discipline/pragmas.test.py b/tests/discipline/pragmas.test.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..87f177e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/discipline/pragmas.test.py
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+"""Discipline test — every ``# pragma: no cover`` carries an inline reason.
+
+The rule: pragmas are allowed only on individual lines, each with an inline
+reason after the pragma text. File-level pragmas and bare pragmas without
+a reason are banned outright — same discipline as the type-ignore rule.
+"""
+
+import io
+import re
+import tokenize
+from pathlib import Path
+
+import pytest
+
+_REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).parent.parent.parent
+_EDIFY_ROOT = _REPO_ROOT / "edify"
+_TESTS_ROOT = _REPO_ROOT / "tests"
+
+_PRAGMA_LINE_PATTERN = re.compile(r"#\s*pragma:\s*no cover\b(.*)$")
+
+
+def _every_python_file():
+    for source_root in (_EDIFY_ROOT, _TESTS_ROOT):
+        yield from source_root.rglob("*.py")
+
+
+def _pragma_comments(python_file):
+    source_text = python_file.read_text()
+    for token in tokenize.tokenize(io.BytesIO(source_text.encode("utf-8")).readline):
+        if token.type != tokenize.COMMENT:
+            continue
+        matched = _PRAGMA_LINE_PATTERN.search(token.string)
+        if matched is None:
+            continue
+        yield token.start[0], token.string, matched.group(1)
+
+
[email protected]("python_file", sorted(_every_python_file()), ids=lambda path: str(path))
+def test_no_bare_pragma_no_cover_without_inline_reason(python_file):
+    for line_number, comment_text, reason_suffix in _pragma_comments(python_file):
+        stripped_reason = reason_suffix.strip()
+        if stripped_reason == "" or stripped_reason[0] not in "—:-":
+            pytest.fail(
+                f"{python_file.relative_to(_REPO_ROOT)}:{line_number} carries "
+                f"{comment_text!r} without an inline reason. The rule is: every pragma "
+                "gets an em-dash-separated reason on the same line, e.g. "
+                "'# pragma: no cover — <why this branch is unreachable>'."
+            )